http://www.worldvision.org/content.nsf/sponsor/sponsor-myanmar
June 15, 2011
Little did the director of World Vision-Myanmar know when he
stole a weekend away with his son for some much-needed RandR , that I would do
an impromptu interview of him at the Inle Resort over dinner, while we both juggled
our tired kids and shoptalk. I was pleasantly surprised to be seated at the table next to him at dinner since I had been dying to speak to someone at World Vision Myanmar but communication is difficult with NGO's in Myanmar.
I wanted to speak with a World Vision rep because it is a Christian charity that has given very strong support of much-needed programs in health, education, and social welfare. I have been very impressed by the work World Vision has done in Malaysia, and it, in fact, was the organization that helped me set establish real working relationships with local Malaysian NGO’s working with refugees.
I wanted to speak with a World Vision rep because it is a Christian charity that has given very strong support of much-needed programs in health, education, and social welfare. I have been very impressed by the work World Vision has done in Malaysia, and it, in fact, was the organization that helped me set establish real working relationships with local Malaysian NGO’s working with refugees.
In November, 2010,
the Myanmar military junta changed into a civilian government. At the time, Ken
and I laughed at what seemed a sham to procure international favor but keep
their fisthold of power. The World Vision Myanmar director confirmed, in our chat, what has
surprised us again and again here, that many skeptics here think that actual
small, substantial steps towards change is happened.
The World Vision director said that there hasn’t been a real
change in the amount spent on education or NGO access to education – only 4.5%
of the economy is spent on education, with less than 2% on health, but over 25%
on the military. To me, it’s more than 25% for the military due to kickbacks
and military-profiting businesses masquerading as private businesses, like
hotels. There has, however, been change in releasing the military grip a bit on local less contested ethnic areas, like the Shan state and more. The new government is allowing
local states to have some self-governance. That is a real step since the
military has been forcing unity and threatened by self-governance, flouting an
agreement made by the opposition leader Aung Sun Su Kye’s General father at the
end of British rule for the states to have the option of self-governance if
they weren’t happy with the post-colonial national government.
There also has been some movement towards a bit more
transparency and partnership of some of the government departments with World
Vision. The government social welfare department head invited the World Vision
director to travel with him around Myanmar, visiting some government sites
along with some World Vision programs. This limited awareness of each other’s
work allows the government to appreciate and maybe be more willing to open
doors to World Vision’s, along with other NGO’s, work in Myanmar.
World Vision has over 70 health providers and early
education, free secondary education, and vocational training programs around Myanmar. The
government is unwilling to provide World Vision access to its schools.
Officially, they would not let my guides take me to the 5 schools I’ve seen.
Unofficially, we can get local school permission for the elementary but not the
middle and high schools. It’s also easier to get individual access to
government elementary schools in the rural areas, with less government monitoring.
World Vision has not been given a “Memorandum of
Understanding” (MOU) giving World Vision access to government schools from the government.
UNICEF has received such a MOU, though, for work in the government elementary schools only.
I asked the World Vision director what he thought about socialization of fear with the goal of unquestioning respect in the schools. He agreed about there being little tolerance for critical thinking, with an emphasis on repetition and chanting in the government school system. He did not agree with the Burma Refugee Teachers that Burmese kids are particularly “stubborn,” an argument used to justify the continued use of the cane as corporal punishment in the refugee schools in KL. And, he thought that Myanmar students were particularly passive and docile – he doubts that corporal punishment is excessive in Myanmar. This is the opposite of one of our guides' opinion that Myanmar school teachers start with serious corporal punishment early on to reinforce respect for teachers; perhaps, corporal punishment hasn’t always been necessary to achieve that goal. Still, if the government prohibited excessive beatings by teachers of the students a couple years ago, then it must have been an issue or problem somewhere.
I asked the World Vision director what he thought about socialization of fear with the goal of unquestioning respect in the schools. He agreed about there being little tolerance for critical thinking, with an emphasis on repetition and chanting in the government school system. He did not agree with the Burma Refugee Teachers that Burmese kids are particularly “stubborn,” an argument used to justify the continued use of the cane as corporal punishment in the refugee schools in KL. And, he thought that Myanmar students were particularly passive and docile – he doubts that corporal punishment is excessive in Myanmar. This is the opposite of one of our guides' opinion that Myanmar school teachers start with serious corporal punishment early on to reinforce respect for teachers; perhaps, corporal punishment hasn’t always been necessary to achieve that goal. Still, if the government prohibited excessive beatings by teachers of the students a couple years ago, then it must have been an issue or problem somewhere.
The director did agree that it was likely that corporal
punishment was used in the Buddhist Free Schools, by the nuns and monks.
An important take-home message is that docility and
passivity in learning is reinforced by the education system in Myanmar. My
impression is that the government limits NGO and foreigner access to its
education system to preserve their teaching style and use the schools for
indoctrination of the children into the belief in a perfect Myanmar union via
propaganda. And, I still suspect that, especially in the rebellious minority states, the government uses schools to keep the ethnic groups docile and down.
It’s unfortunate that there is not more transparency and
openness in Myanmar in education because it is ripe for educational exchanges.
Pre-military, there used to be more educational exchanges with the U.S., as there
currently are now in Malaysia, via Fulbright or Humphrey exchange programs.
Now, there are almost none. Myanmar is ripe for getting Fulbright English
Teaching Associates (ETA’s) since the government schools teach English, as a
second language, from an early age.
Hopefully the new civilian government will be more open to allowing domestic and international NGO's to help its impoverished citizens and their education. The U.S. state department needs to turn the heat up on both Burma and neighboring countries of Thailand and Malaysia to give access to a real education for Burmese ethnic minority students.
Hopefully the new civilian government will be more open to allowing domestic and international NGO's to help its impoverished citizens and their education. The U.S. state department needs to turn the heat up on both Burma and neighboring countries of Thailand and Malaysia to give access to a real education for Burmese ethnic minority students.